Design Research Dissertation #7 Final Submission

 Design Research Dissertation

Date : July/10/2023

Name : Mabuchi Arata

Lecture : Visual Research DIssertation

Lecturer's name : DR Noorhayati Saad

ID : 0351579  

1, Introduction

After submitting the my final research document with visual design in PDF format, I found that the next task is about Creating and submit my final assessment in KREATE TDS journal format, which means that I have to remake some of the research in special document format to recognise my research into the public. I start to reorganise the document again for KREATE format, however I suddenly realise that I have missed several document to submit and misunderstand what I have to submit, therefore I shift my work to remake some copy of document that is capable to submit and publish in the public. Additionally, I also have to upload my weekly progress report, unfortunatelly, I have missed some of the personal feedback, however I still complete this weekly reports too.  

2, Turnitin

First of all, before I am going to take a notes about the turnintin reports which I missed to submit, I have to start from explaining what TURNITIN index similarity report is, basically, TURNITIN report is the report to check the document is not copying from other document available on the internet, although the research itself is allowing to refer other document, the document itslef must maintain its originality which means that the document can'y just stole other research's idea. In other words, I have to avoid plagiarism in my document. After I find the place to post my document for Turnitin check, I have to fix the document before I submit to check, the reason for this is because I can't post the work too many times and I want to fix some spellings and grammer errors.

The PDF document above is my draft work of my research dissertaion, it may look nice at the fist look, however, we we take a look closer to check, there are some spelling or grammer error exists and it cant be used to submit to the TURNITIN to receive a receipt to check plagiarism in my document. Thanks to the MIcrosoft word's function, the text itself has been improved much better by fixing some grammer and spelling error, however the microsoft word's text editor suggested to me that the word "different types" in various times and I refuse to change, the reason is because I wanted to emphasise the word to focus on the process of comparison to find out my main research topic which is about "Relationship between story and personality for character design in video games".

After Compliting a fixing process in my document for TURNITIN check, my work has been submitted and received this result so I passed the chack and I can move to the next process which I have to make an shorter KREATE document for recognition.

3, KREATE

Even great research doen't accept if the document doesn't recognise in the world, the KREATE document rocess is the process to make the research I've done since last September to this July. The MIB told us that in the final submission, the document itself must be typed in the given document and the text itself must e shorter.

The process itself has been done without any troubles. The point I mainly focused on this section is that the original document was organised all the research findings into different part depends on the research findings and conclusion, therefore I needed to summarises all the ideas I mainly got as final conclusion to make it shorter than original document I already submit but I also needed to type the text as required number, as the result, the text itself has been perfectly focuses the most main point of the text.

4, Weekly progression

Unfortunatelly, there's not many things I can talk in this section because of lack of datas I've got, this is because I sometimes missed the personal meetings with Dr. Hayati, however, I am still able to organize general notice and some of my personal notice I've got.

In the end, my weekly progression must be something not enough for submission, but I still think that Ive got what I've noticed to improve my work and I also took notes that made, the point I mainly focused was the taking a nots about the key to improve mt research and work.

5, Concluson

I finally complete my work, however, the work itself doesn't satisfy me, the research itself has been completed successfully include both primary research and literature review. The effort itself I've done to organise the ideas I've got wasn't bad and I could use it in my future research, however, the research point itself isn't something enough to show in the public, In my opinion, the research topics has been changed a bit through the research from relationship between story settings and character;s personality for the video game character design to the impact of both backgrond settings and chgaracter's personalities ti the video game character designs in the video games. I must focus the main theme of research and I can't shift to the different idea.